Voting closed at 8 pm on
Tuesday at the Israel Prison Service with 81.74% of the 10,000 eligible
citizens serving time in prison carrying out their right to vote.
I am not surprised prisoners can vote, we have been doing that for years in Canada, but what surprises me is that they cannot get a better turnout from the prisoner population.
Update: I found a picture from today's vote in an unnamed Israeli prison at Jpost...Photo Credit: Ben Hartman
The keys to heavenly paradise are yours if you vote Shas.
That at least is the message from beyond the grave of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the
late, revered spiritual leader of the Shas party, which has appeared on cards
being handed out to voters by party activists today.
The card bears on one side an image of a a golden key and on the other side the
words a picture of Yosef with the phrase “The word of Maran [Yosef]: Whoever
votes Shas goes to straight to the Garden of Eden.
Distributing amulets, promising blessings as a result of voting for a certain
party or threatening curses for voting for the ‘wrong’ party or all forbidden
by the Law for Knesset Elections.
An appeal against the distribution of the cards was upheld by the chairman of
the Central Elections Committee Supreme Court Justice Salim Joubran on Tuesday
and the party was banned from handing them out.
Shas has however however been using several other means to reach out to their
potential voters to inform them of how Yosef would want them to vote.
A message sent out by SMS and WhatsApp to voters reads “Maran Rabbi Ovadia Yosef:
I won’t forgive someone who does not vote Shas, not in this world and not in
the world to come.”
Israel was founded as a socialist state, and even in 2015,
it reminds, more or less, one. It is important to understand that ordinary Israelis are a long
way from abandoning their socialist roots which why a party like Meretz (the
Israeli Jewish version of the Communist Party) still has a place on the Israeli
political map.
The first truism of Israeli politics is to understand all
politics starts on the left end of the political spectrum in Israel. What makes
a party left or rightwing in Israel has nothing to do with political theory
oridealogy as much as where each party
stands on the security issues.This is
why a party like Shas which fully supports the idea of a social welfare state,
but is characterized as a ‘right-wing’ party.
If I were to map economic theory and policies to equivalent Canadian
political road map and removed the ‘security issues’ which define a party as
left or right wing. The Israeli Labour party would stand far to the left of
the New Democratic party, Likud would stand somewhat to the left of the
Liberals, and the Jewish home still stand somewhat around Joe Clark Conservatives.
Parties like Yesh Atid lead by former television personality Yair Lapid, and Kulanu (“All
of Us”) lead by former Likud member Moshe Kahlon represent the Israeli ‘centre’
which means it is nestled between Labor
and Likud but remains firmly on the socialist left. Yesh Atid, strength comes
from the Ashkenazi secular and anti-religious establishment; while Kuhlon
represents traditional but not particularly observant Israeli element.
Israeli polls are notoriously unreliable and usually have a
large margin of error - despite the usual 4.5 percentage representing
their official margin of error. . Let me give you a concrete example
of the failure of the Israeli pollsters. The strength of new comer Yesh
Atid
(Futurist Party) with 19 seats in the 2013 election was the
surprise.
No pollster was predicting a Future sweep of 19 mandates, and had pegged
Yesh
Atid with 12 seats inbest case
scenarios. That 7 seat difference made hogwash out of that 4.5 margin of error.
In
the 2013 cycle, Likud ran on a combined ticket with Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel is
our home). Yisrael Beiteinu was head by clowned prince of Israeli politics,
Avigdor Lieberman. This cycle, Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu is running on separate
tickets. Liebrman’s party is mired in the middle of what could turn out to be
the ‘mother’ of all Israeli corruption scandals - and that's saying something. Yisrael Beitenu drew its
membership from the secular Russian immigrant community. Yedioth has pegged their mandates to around 5
seats for the 2015 cycle down from the 11 or so mandates Yisrael Beitenu
brought in the last election cycle. So the question we need to ask
ourselvesis; where are thosemandates likely to end up in this current
election cycle?
The
Labour ticket this election cycle is a combined ticket with Hatnua lead by
Tzippi Livni. In the last election cycle Livni’s Hatnua party garnered 6
mandates, but with the defection of some major supporters, and a stunningly
poor parliamentary showing by Livni during the last government, Hatnua would be
lucky to make the voting threshold for 1 mandate let alone 6. Hence, the desire
early in the election cycle to join the Labor ticket. Labor is projected to
carry 26 mandates according to the last Yedioth Ahronoth poll published. So if we were to combine the previous 5
mandates from Hatnua and Labor’s party’s 15, we have a net Labor gain 4 seats
but from where do these people come from? It is not likely they are former Yisrael
Beiteinu supporters.
The Israeli Centre – where even the centre is split.
Yesh Atid – Centre Left (Sort of, kind of)
This brings us to the last election surprise, Yesh Atid (Futurist party). Yesh Atid is considered a ‘Israeli centralist secular Ashkenazi’ party.
In the last knesset session, Yesh Atid received 19 mandates, but are now
projected to only retain 12 mandates. This is the result of the declining
popularity and the dismal performance shown by Yair Lapid. He has an absolutely
disastrous turn as Finance Minister, and sponsored legislation for drafting the
Charedim.
Normally, this would be a pretty popular move outside of Charedim
circles, but inserting a jail term for non-compliance was widely viewed as
overtly harsh. One of the problems with Lapid is that he never works well with
others. Too long a television prima donna? Perhaps. So where will those former
Yesh Atid supporters go? My best guess – probably a relatively even split between
Labor or Kalanu.
Kalanu – Centre Right:
The former Likud Minister of Communications and Minister of Welfare and
Social Services left Likud and politics in 2013. During his tenure as a Likud Minister,
he lowered electricity rates for the poor, headed an inquiry into Bank Charges,
and he is thought to have been the driving force into opening up the cellular
phone market in Israel. This move directly lead to increased competition and lower
rates for consumers. Kahlon remains enormously popular in Israeli politics.
Yedioth has newcomer Kalanu pegged with 8 mandates. I think there is a
reasonable possibility that Kalanu will end higher. Here is the nature home for
more centralist Likud members, dissatisfied Yesh Atid voters and potentially former
Yisrael Beiteinu voters who still want to cast a vote but not for the clowned
prince of Israeli politics.
Religious Parties:
In Israel, religious parties are ‘characterized as ‘right-wing’ parties but it
would be more accurate to characterize these parties as pragmatic parties of
self-interest. They will willingly sit
in any coalition government provided their interests are served. Pay them off
and they will tow pretty much whatever line you want.
Shas came into the last Knesset with 11 mandates, but owing to the leadership
fall out between convicted felon Aryeh Deri and Eli Yishai, Yishai left to
form his own Charedi party Yachad. Yachad has subsequently merged with Otzma
Yehudit to become the Yachad Ha Am Itanu ticket. I have to be honest, I just do
not understand why any voter would cast a vote with Deri at the helm of Shas. My
gut says, Shas support will bleed a lot more than 4 mandates this election
cycle.
Yachad – Ha Am Itanu. Eli Yishai’s new party is pegged at 4, just barely
making the mandate for a seat in the Knesset. He has his demographic and bleeds
Shas’ support. It is a religious based party with right wing security issues.
Yishai is thought to be reasonable and someone Likud can work with. Shas
primarily represented religiously observant Sephardic voters.
United Torah Judaism. An Ashkenazi Charedim party. Owning to party leader Yair Lapid sponsoring
the Charedim draft bill, United Torah Judaism swears it will not sit in any
coalition in which Yesh Atid is a member. I think they are pretty serious about
this….but the bribe to get them to change their mind might bankrupt the country.
The Israel Loonie Left:
The Zionist Union - This is a merged ticket with the Israeli Labor and Tzippi Livni’s Hatnua
party. Livni started out as a Likud member, then jumped ship to go with Ariel
Sharon in Kadima, she eventually headed Kadima only to lose an election and the
party leadership. After a good sulk, she decided to found her own political
party so she could be a leader, more or
less indefinitely. No one likes her, she whines a lot and does not play well
with others. She will never be elected Prime Minister except by stealth.
The Israeli Labor party had a proud history and is now being run by a man
who just narrowly escaped indictment for election fraud during Ehud Barak’s run
for Prime Minister. He’s got a tin ear and speaks with a high pitch whine.
Apparently, he has been undergoing speech therapy for that. Yitzhak "Boujie" Herzog is part of the Ashkenazi elite in
Israel. Herzog’s platform consists in being primarily as ‘Not BIBI’. This more
or less works for Obama. In fact, if I were to describe Herzog with an Americanism; I would call him 'all hat, no cattle'. He made a disaster deal to merge his ticket with
Tzippi Livni and offered her a rotating Prime Ministership; if they win.
No one in their right mind should
want Herzog to be able to form a coalition and negotiate with the Palestinians or
the White House. The
real irony in ‘Zionist Union’ ticket is just how many anti-zionist have united
behind Herzog. In a surprise move, Herzog and Livni have
announced that Livni has offered to give up the rotating premiership.
She's taking one for the team...of course, I haven't seen anything in
writing, and when dealing with Livni; you need it in writing, witnessed and backed up with video.
The Zionist Union is currently
running with 26 mandates and still cannot form a government. The religious
parties will not sit with any government which includes Yair Lapid. Meretz won’t
still in any coalition which includes a religious party. And there is a good
chance Yesh Atid will never sit with any Labor coalition that includes the
Joint Arab List.
Joint Arab List, is a combined ticket for three different Arab parties who
decided to bury their differences in order to present a united front against
the ‘Zionists’. Reality is, there is new legislation raising the bar for votes
needed to enter the Knesset and none of the Arab parties could reach the bar on
their own without banding together. They
are not good neighbours and it is simply a matter of time before the ‘UAL’
explores into inter politic clashes among themselves.
Meretz. Forget these losers, they will be lucky to hold onto 5 mandates and
I will not cry if they don’t make the threshold. Never having to read a
headline quoting Gal-On again – is simply priceless. Of course, they will not sit in any
coalition with a religious party.
The Israel Right.
Yisrael Beiteinu lead by Lieberman, clowned
Prince of Israeli politics. Massive corruption scandal decimated what
was left of Lieberman's party list just after the Knesset was dissolved.
Yisrael Beiteinu drew its base from the secular Russian immigrant
community and it will be interesting to see if Yisrael Beiteinu's base
chooses to stay home or throw in their lot with another party. Likud is
the natural option, but Bennett at Bayit Yehudi did a stellar job
representing Israel's case during the recent conflict with Gaza, and his
'stop apologizing' promotional videos might just appeal.
Likud
lead by Bibi Netanyahu. The party everyone loves to hate – with good
reason. This isn't the Likud of Menachem Begin, but Netanyahu remains
the only leader who has a reasonable chance of
clubbing together a coalition, and Likud still has the 'get out the vote'
machine in place. In fact, even with 21 mandates, he can easily
pull 64 mandates without Yesh Atid, JAL or even the Zionist Union.
The
real shame about
Israeli democracy, is that you cannot have two Prime Ministers. One to
deal with
all foreigners, and another to run the country. Bibi’s real
weakness in the last two Knesset sessions has been running the country
internally. Bibi gives a great Anglo sound bite but it takes more to govern
Israel. Furthermore, Bibi is slippery even when not wet and I would not
put it pass him not to have been making a backroom deal to enter into a
'unity coalition government' with the Zionist Union with the caveat
Livni never has a turn with leadership of the Zionist Union before the
votes are cast.
This brings me to Bayit Yehudi run by Naftali Bennett. Pollsters are
predicting Bayit Yehudi, despite Bennet’s rising profile in the last
Knesset,
will maintain only 12 mandates. There are rumours that Bayit Yehudi is
now
polling in single digits, but without hearing of increased mandates for
Likud or
Kalanu, I am not buying it since Bennett is not guilty of any recent
missteps to account for a sudden recent drop. At the start of the
campaign trail Bennett was polling 16-17
mandates and rising. A miss-step mid-way in the campaign saw a descent in the number of mandates in an act designed to widen the appeal and base of his party. I would not count Bennett out entirely and he is widely believed to be a ‘future’
Prime Ministerial material...just not in this election.
If I was
an Israeli voter, I would be hard pressed to vote between Kalanu and
Bayit Yehudi. After the Zionist Union's 11th hour announcement. It's
Bayit Yehudi all the way for me. I wouldn't want Bibi getting into bed
with Herzog-Livini, and the best way to prevent that is a strong Bayit
Yehudi.
So my predictions; Likud forms the government with Bibi as Prime Minister in a strong rightwing
coalition. Last night, there was a right wing rally in Tel Aviv's Rabin
Square. Ha'aretz suggests only 25,000 showed up. Arutz Sheva claims
100,000. If the truth lies closer to Arutz Sheva's estimates on election
day we will be watching a left wing impulsion. The election commission
would not allow any Israeli singers to perform at rally last night in
Tel Aviv, so Naftali Bennett took to the stage to sing Jerusalem of
Gold.
On the last day of Black History month, I found this via Mosaic Magazine via CJN:
Emerson Swift Mahon, born a Christian, left
his native Grenada for Canada in 1912 in search of higher education and
harboring a deeply-felt interest in Judaism. Two years later, he
enlisted in the Canadian army to fight in World War I, and there met a
Jewish chaplain named Herman Abramowitz. Eiran Harris writes:
Mahon persuaded Rabbi Abramowitz of his sincere desire to convert,
and after a lengthy course of instruction in the intricacies of Judaism,
an appropriate test of knowledge, and a religious ceremony, Rabbi
Abramowitz signed the conversion certificate.
After the war Mahon settled in Winnipeg and graduated in 1929
with a science degree from the University of Manitoba. . . .
Unfortunately, the Depression forced him to accept a job as a
sleeping-car porter with the Canadian Pacific Railway. . . . In
Winnipeg, Mahon joined Young Judaea, a Zionist youth organization, and
quickly rose through the ranks. His work on the railway enabled him to
organize chapters throughout Western Canada as well as to photograph
every synagogue between Winnipeg and Vancouver.
Mahon also became proficient in Hebrew and Yiddish: “on the way to
synagogue on Saturday mornings, it was quite common to observe Mahon
urging his children, in Yiddish, to hurry along.”
Ryan Bellarose, a writer at
Israellycool, asks an interesting question in a post called ‘History Lesson’.
I see these same problems now with
young Jewish people in North America. Aside from a few, they have not been
properly taught their own history, and they have been sold a false narrative.
Instead of being proud at surviving almost ridiculous odds, and achieving
something no other displaced indigenous people has ever accomplished, they feel
shame at their people’s success.
How messed up is that? They come
from a people who, today, number maybe 14 million worldwide, yet
whose contributions to the world far outweigh their mere numbers, yet they feel
ashamed? They come from a nation that survived two thousand years of
exile, only to emerge triumphant to retake their ancestral lands from the hands
of their colonizers. Yet they are made to feel like they have done something
wrong and must apologize? No.
We need to ask: how did we
allow the twisting of the quintessential bully story?
To answer Ryan, one needs an
understanding of Jewish history and the make-up of North American Jews.
North America is host to the largest Jewish community outside of Israel. If we
were to examine the Jewish community in North American, the largest single
group of Jews is self-identified as ‘secular or culturally’ Jewish. The second
largest group, after those self-identifying ‘secular’ Jews, comes from the
ranks of ‘Reform Judaism’. I suspect the vast majority of those ‘secular’ Jews
also draw their roots from the Reform movement, but I digress.
Reform Judaism was born in Germany
in the 19th century. I am not going to go over all the ins and outs
of the Reform movement, since this history bores me senseless (and I would
rather curl up with my bio of Rav Kook) but suffice to say that Reform Judaism
rejected a number of core Jewish beliefs. Among those beliefs rejected by the
early Reform movement was a belief in the coming messiah to redeem the Jewish
people and re-establish our state in our ancestral homeland or the re-building
of our Temple in Jerusalem. Reform Judaism rejected idea that any Jew was
dwelling in exile. To Reform Jews, there simply was no Galut. Jews were
full citizens of those societies in which they were dwelling, and the only
meaningful Jewish mission was to address universal issues of social justice
faced by both Jews and non-Jews of those societies.
It was imperative to the
early Reform Jewish thinkers that Judaism became merely a religion, just like
any other religion.Nazi Germany killed off most of the
‘Reform’ Jews of Europe, and after the Shoah, Reform Judaism ceased to be a
significant religious stream of interest outside North America. The devastation
laid to waste in the Shoah did cause a serious ‘rethink’ by Reform Jewish
philosophers towards ‘Zionism’ (the movement for self-deter mination for the
Jewish people) for a time, but the kind of ‘Zionism’ the North American Reform
Jewish community was prepared to support could not have a religious nationalist
component; hence, their contempt towards the Dati Leumi movement. Concepts
based on ‘indigenous rights’ for the Jewish people in their historic homeland
conflicted with the founding characteristics of Reform Judaism.
This is why so many so-called
progressive Jewish organizations like J Street, B'Tselem or Rabbis for Human
Rights often appear to be so ‘anti-Jewish’ in nature and drawn the bulk of
their Jewish membership from the Reform community. That is not to say, all Reform
or Reform influenced Jews are ignorant of their history and/or refuse to
recognize themselves as members of Kol Yisrael, but as North American Reform
Judaism moves closer and closer to being a general religion based on
humanitarian, rather than, Jewish values, well, they risk being our lost tribe
rather than a members of our tribe.
To complicate matters further, political
progressive liberals, put enormous pressure on secular and reform Jews to
actively disassociate and divorce themselves from the community of Kol Yisrael.
Elliot Abrams touches on this in a recent article on this very theme
highlighting the Obama Administration’s manufactured outrage over everything ‘Israeli’.
The third Obama administration reason for building up this
crisis is also deadly serious: it is to use the current tension to harm
Israel’s support in the United States permanently. All opinion polls in the
last several years show a partisan edge in support: overall support for Israel
is steady and high, but its composition is changing. More and more Republicans
support Israel, and the gap between Democratic and Republican support levels is
growing. President Obama acts as if he sees this as a terrific development, one
that should be enlarged as much as possible before he leaves office. That way
he would leave behind not just an Iran deal, but weakened support for Israel on
Iran and everything else. Support for Israel would become less of a
bipartisan matter and more a divisive issue between the two parties. It is not
hard to envision Obama in retirement joining Jimmy Carter as a frequent critic
of Israel, pushing the Democratic party to move away from its decades of very
strong support for the Jewish state.
Perhaps this manufactured crisis will diminish after
Netanyahu’s speech, where he is likely to say things that many Democrats still
agree with. Perhaps it will diminish if Iran rejects any deal, even on the
terms the Obama administration is offering. Perhaps Netanyahu will lose his
election and a new Labor Party-led government will appear in Jerusalem. But
more likely, the remaining 23 months of the Obama administration will be months
of continuing tension between Israel and the United States. That is because the
administration desires that tension and views it as productive. The problem is
not Netanyahu’s speech, which right or wrong to deliver should be a minor and
passing factor in bilateral relations. The real issues are deeper and far more
serious. This president has fostered a crisis in relations because it advances
his own political and policy goals. That is what his subordinates and many
Democrats in Congress are trying very hard, and with real success, to
obfuscate.
Jewish history is long and diverse. We
have seen this type of Jew before. They are not self-hating Jews, but
Hellenistic Jews, robed in modern garb. To modern Hellenistic Jews, the greatest
threat to their existence comes not from murderous intentions of Anti-Semites
and Assimilationists, but to the fidelity shown by the Jewish people to the
covenant of our Torah in our land.