Life is Belief & Struggle - Ahmed Shawqi

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Revolt of the Conservatives

It is no secret that I have been in political coventry for a while now. I realize I stepped out of so-called mainstream conservative politics mainly because I was sensing such a disconnect between those who pretended to represent the interests of conservatives in society and those who really were 'conservative'. There was so little thought given to who and what the maddening political conservative crowd rallied around - or the dire implications for Western society and the concept of nation state. Conservative/progressive politics has been reduced to some kind of major league football game where every one picks teams/sides rather than choosing the side that uses their principles as a guide to create policy which would benefit every Canadian. American Conservative magazine has published one of the most dangerous and potentially game changing article by Mike Lofgren. This is the beginning of the next big change in conservative political thinking.
It was 1993, during congressional debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement. I was having lunch with a staffer for one of the rare Republican congressmen who opposed the policy of so-called free trade. To this day, I remember something my colleague said: “The rich elites of this country have far more in common with their counterparts in London, Paris, and Tokyo than with their fellow American citizens.” That was only the beginning of the period when the realities of outsourced manufacturing, financialization of the economy, and growing income disparity started to seep into the public consciousness, so at the time it seemed like a striking and novel statement.
There is just so much here that it is hard to link to a single paragraph - so onward with the linky goodness.
I do not mean secession by physical withdrawal from the territory of the state, although that happens from time to time—for example, Erik Prince, who was born into a fortune, is related to the even bigger Amway fortune, and made yet another fortune as CEO of the mercenary-for-hire firm Blackwater, moved his company (renamed Xe) to the United Arab Emirates in 2011. What I mean by secession is a withdrawal into enclaves, an internal immigration, whereby the rich disconnect themselves from the civic life of the nation and from any concern about its well being except as a place to extract loot. Our plutocracy now lives like the British in colonial India: in the place and ruling it, but not of it. If one can afford private security, public safety is of no concern; if one owns a Gulfstream jet, crumbling bridges cause less apprehension—and viable public transportation doesn’t even show up on the radar screen. With private doctors on call and a chartered plane to get to the Mayo Clinic, why worry about Medicare? Being in the country but not of it is what gives the contemporary American super-rich their quality of being abstracted and clueless.
Want more?
To some degree the rich have always secluded themselves from the gaze of the common herd; their habit for centuries has been to send their offspring to private schools. But now this habit is exacerbated by the plutocracy’s palpable animosity towards public education and public educators, as Michael Bloomberg has demonstrated. To the extent public education “reform” is popular among billionaires and their tax-exempt foundations, one suspects it is as a lever to divert the more than $500 billion dollars in annual federal, state, and local education funding into private hands—meaning themselves and their friends. What Halliburton did for U.S. Army logistics, school privatizers will do for public education. A century ago, at least we got some attractive public libraries out of Andrew Carnegie. Noblesse oblige like Carnegie’s is presently lacking among our seceding plutocracy. In both world wars, even a Harvard man or a New York socialite might know the weight of an army pack. Now the military is for suckers from the laboring classes whose subprime mortgages you just sliced into CDOs and sold to gullible investors in order to buy your second Bentley or rustle up the cash to get Rod Stewart to perform at your birthday party. The sentiment among the super-rich towards the rest of America is often one of contempt rather than noblesse.
While Lofgren's article focuses on the "American" the same process is actively at work in Canada. The Harperites are cut from the same bolt of fabric as the alleged 'republican/conservative' class that Lofgren is warning us of. This is corporate cronyism in action with nary a thought or care given to the lives of the citizenry.

No comments:

Post a Comment